The Atlantic March 19, 2025
Posted by Dr. Robert Owens in Uncategorized.Tags: black-history, britain, History, Politics, slavery
add a comment
That the Atlantic Ocean was a barrier between the Old World and the New was attested to by the thousands of years the Americas lay in splendid isolation. Sporadic contact by the Norse, Irish fisherman and the stray mariner blown off course did nothing to end the nearly insurmountable barrier. Then as the technological expertise of the Europeans advanced, as their navigation skills developed a crack was made in the wall by Columbus. He was soon followed by larger and larger Spanish expeditions in the middle latitudes and Portuguese in the south. Soon their empires rivaled Rome and shifted the balance of power in Europe in favor of the Iberians.
The emerging powers of England, France and the Netherlands soon began to prey upon the rich Spanish, then to explore and settle on their own further north. The initial trickle of explorers, adventurers and traders soon became a flood and then a torrent as the wealth and opportunity of the Americas beckoned.
English built their colonies along the Eastern seaboard of North America wedged between the Spanish in Florida and the French in Canada. One after another the colonies sprang to life, Virginia, New England, the Carolinas, and the Middle Colonies all became consumers of English manufacturers and shippers of raw materials and produce. The Atlantic trade grew from a one-way supply line for precarious adventures on the edge of a wilderness into a well-oiled machine moving cargo in both directions and fueling a booming English economy. It also provided the impetus and the means to build the largest merchant fleet and the most powerful navy in the world. In less than 150 years the Atlantic Ocean went from being a barrier to being a conduit, from being an impediment to being a facilitator and England grew from a poor kingdom on the edge of Europe into a world-shaking empire.
Diversity:
An interesting demographic shift took place in the English colonies that was not paralleled in the colonies of its rivals. This was a development that would have dramatic impact on the later development of the British colonies as well as upon the subsequent growth of the United States. The growth of the colonies began to have a beneficial effect on the homeland. The rise in exports and in the shipping, trade led to a boom in the British economy which in turn led to a drop in the number of people who wanted to immigrate to the colonies. This conundrum could have led to a self-defeating spiral however the British came up with a novel idea; they sought to entice people of other nationalities to immigrate to their colonies.
The other European colonial powers, France, Spain and the Netherlands followed a policy of exclusion and consequently the populations of their colonies remained small and in the New World small eventually meant vulnerable. Eventually this became an instance where size really does matter because the British colonies with their much larger populations were able to absorb both the Dutch and the French colonies in North America in many ways because of their denser population.
In a Europe divided by nationality, language and custom how did the British crown manage to entice multiple tens of thousands of non-English to settle in their lands and become productive and supportive citizens? First, they turned to their newly absorbed neighbor Scotland. The two countries had been united ever since James VI of Scotland became James I of England. However, they had remained separate kingdoms with one king each with their own parliament, military, treasury, etc. In 1707 the two nations permanently united to form Great Britain. Enticing the Scots with a similar but better climate and more economic opportunity they soon replaced the English as the number one source of colonists for North America.
But this was not enough to keep the boom going so the British turned to the people of Germany. Germany at the time was divided up into many small independent kingdoms, principalities and other types of realms. In theory and on paper the majority of them were united into the Holy Roam Empire with Austria as the usually dominant Hapsburg leader. This was the political reality but the functional reality as experienced by the people was that of a fractured and divided Germany where economic growth was curtailed by local jealousies and international weakness. This unsettled life fostered discontent and a desire for more opportunity. These desires were exploited by the British and soon a torrent of German colonists headed across the Atlantic to swell the population of the British North American venture. The Germans had another benefit; they were by heritage enemies of the French and therefore could be counted on to side with their new government against their ancient enemy.
One major incentive that the British provided was the opportunity to become citizens of the Empire. All an immigrant had to do was live in the colonies for seven years, swear allegiance to the king, take communion in a Protestant church and pay a small fee and they became a citizen with the same rights and privileges any natural born Englishman. This process built a loyal population that within a generation became British in culture, custom and loyalty which combined with the increasing birthrate a larger population automatically provides soon led to the exponential growth of British North America. This growth in turn led to such a difference in size that by the time the final show down with France arrived the ultimate victory was almost a foregone conclusion based upon demographics alone.
The Atlantic as a Conduit for Information:
No longer a barrier the Atlantic became a well-travelled and well-known conduit for trade, immigration and information. Initially the colonies had been further away in time from Britain than the International Space Station is from Houston. Once the colonists arrived in the New World they were effectively cut off from European news and information dependent upon the occasional ship and if they were in the back country perhaps an itinerant merchant with news that was perhaps months if not years out of date.
As the colonies grew and as the Atlantic passage became a well-traveled road these conditions changed. Newspapers began to proliferate, and people began to expect some form of regular contact between the New and the Old World. This brought the colonists into much deeper affinity with the Empire. They no longer felt abandoned at the edge of a howling wilderness, they instead began to see themselves as citizens of a powerful and expanding power. While the largest newspapers were all found in coastal cities there were also several in the interior. All of these helped to integrate the colonies as they were shared and read by one person after another. These multiple news sources didn’t dwell on local news instead they sought to have broader appeal hoping for the hand-to-hand currency that would garner a broad support and a growing reputation. Therefore, they used their locations either on the coast or at some other hub of communication to re-print news from Europe in general and England in particular. What this accomplished was a diminishing of the natural impact of sectionalism or localism and an enhancement of the British character and Imperial outlook of the population.
The Atlantic as a Conduit for Commerce:
What had once been an exclusively one-way trade, Homeland to colonies developed into a vigorous two-way trade and then into a multi-national trade that constantly grew as the export of raw materials increased the colonials prospered and they began to desire much more than the bare necessities. The richer they became the more luxury items they demanded. The traders in Europe were only too glad to extend credit and although the volume of merchandise heading from America to Europe constantly grew it could not keep pace with the desire for the finer things in life. Consequently, the upper echelons of Colonial society found themselves in a debt spiral that for many kept them only one bad harvest away from ruin.
The increased economic activity highlighted one important thing, the average person in America was better off economically than the average person in Britain. They not only had a much greater opportunity to own property they also had a greater opportunity to rise in the social scale. In Britain society was highly stratified and the majority people remained in the class in which they were born. Indeed, the hereditary nobility had a vested interest in maintaining such a tightly knit system of social control.
In the American colonies many of the richest planters rose from nothing often from being an indentured servant. Another contributing factor was that the colonies were virtually exempt from Imperial taxes. The tax burden in Britain was often crushing to pay for wars and the constant need to maintain a military establishment to protect and expand the empire. However, this colonial prosperity and social mobility was not universal. Especially in the cities there was inequality and often crushing poverty. In the winter when ice would close the Northern harbors, and almost all trade would cease there were particularly hard times from the urban poor. Of course, poverty is always a relative term. The poor of the colonies were usually better off than the street dwellers and beggars of European cities. Even the tenant farmers who toiled from sun to sun for someone else and who often found themselves so hopelessly in debt to their patrons that it became a life-long sentence were better off than most of the peasants of Europe.
And there was also the frontier. Always off in the distance was the frontier, the ragged expansion horizon that constantly moved west. Here was a place where people could get a new start often with as little investment as an axe and some hard work a man and his family could carve a farm out of the forest and build a self-sufficient if not prosperous life. However, this was no panacea and no guaranteed pathway to success. Many people were unsuited to frontier life. Others shipwrecked on the shoals of resistance from those who got there first or from the indigenous people who stubbornly thought that their land was still their land.
The Export Trade
As the Eighteenth Century matured the growing export sector became more and more important. The race for subsistence had been won in most places and the rich lands were being exploited in more productive ways. Tobacco, rice, indigo and timber products led the way. Many grew rich from the trade, and they then sought ways to enjoy that wealth. Following the lead of European elites the rich in Americas worked to build bigger and better houses furnished with fine China and staffed with liveried servants. Even on the frontier the successful wanted to display and enjoy their material success.
The relationship between the Homeland and the colonies was just as it was designed to be under the mercantilism which was their driving economic policy. The colonies furnished the Homeland with raw materials and then using the funds generated by the exportation of the raw materials purchased manufactured goods from the budding industrialists of the Homeland. It was a circular trade that kept all the funds within the Empire and contributed to the strength of Great Britain at every turn.
The prosperity of the great planters and the large farmers developed into a desire to live what they termed a genteel life, refined far beyond anything earlier generations of colonists could have imagined. The increased information provided by the colonial newspapers and the increased travel inspired and facilitated by the improving system of roads tended to homogenize and unite the upper echelons of society throughout the colonies and even with those of the Homeland. A sense of caste and class was born that was alien to the egalitarian milieu of the frontier.
One aspect of the large percentage of non-English immigrants that the Eighteenth Century brought to America was the development of a pluralistic society. All of the European societies that sought to colonize America were either to a lesser or greater extent xenophobic. They all saw themselves as the standard for development and society. None of them was especially partial to the culture of others and all of them lived in a world of them and us. If you weren’t one of us, you must be one of them. The mixing of the English, the Scots, the Irish and the Germans combined with the leveling experience of the frontier produced a new type of society wherein people related to those with similar experiences instead of those with the same ancestry.
The Slave Culture
The majority of those who came to America in the Eighteenth century were not immigrants from Europe seeking freedom and opportunity. They were instead enslaved Africans kidnapped in West Africa by other Africans and sold into perpetual bondage. Over a million slaves were imported mainly by the British. This vast enterprise in human trafficking greatly enriched the British Empire, allowing them to surpass their rivals in the production of sugar and tobacco. There was an outlandish death rate that kept the African slaves from becoming an overwhelming majority even though in many areas they did become a majority. While millions were brought in hundreds of thousands died from overwork and disease. The horror and violence necessitated by a slave culture degraded both the slave and the master.
There was quite a difference between the culture of slavery as practiced in the northern colonies and the southern. In the north there were no great plantations and no crops such as rice or tobacco which lent themselves well to slave gangs. Therefore, from the beginning the number of slaves in the north was much smaller than the number in the South. Whereas the slave holders of the South encouraged the slaves to wed and have children looking to grow their own crop of servants as opposed to buying them. The slave owners of the North discouraged this practice and in fact kept a much larger proportion of male slaves to female thus precluding any massive number of marriages among their slaves.
The African people in America in many subtle ways attempted to maintain their diverse cultural heritages but as time and contact with whites and other Africans from divergent cultures progressed the African American culture was born as a blend of all these influences. In the face of unspeakable and unconscionable brutality they survived and eventually thrived despite all they had to endure.
From the Book America: Volume One Colonial History
Carolina February 26, 2025
Posted by Dr. Robert Owens in Uncategorized.Tags: american-revolution, britain, History, slavery, travel
add a comment
Unlike the other English colonies in North America the Carolinas were established under the auspices of the Lords Proprietors by West Indian planters. The Lords Proprietors, 8 extremely rich men were based in London, and they wanted experienced colonists to ensure the success of their financial venture.
Many of the rich planters of the West Indies did not want to divide their land between multiple heirs. They instead followed a strict enforcement of primogeniture leaving everything to the eldest son. Daughters were of course married off, but younger sons found it hard to make their way and the Carolinas offered a great opportunity to set them up in great style and add to the family wealth at the same time.
However, there was a potential problem. Founding a society of great planters on a frontier had its dangers. The planters were afraid that their slaves would run off into the wilds and perhaps join with the Indians to fight against them. To avoid this, they devised an ingenious plan to at the least keep the slaves and the Indians apart. And at best they make them mortal enemies. To accomplish their purpose, they made treaties with the Indians providing them with weapons and other trade goods for returning run-away slaves.
The Colonists:
Though this was a society designed to be a steep pyramid led by a small group of very rich planters who started at the top and had every intention of staying there the colonists were overall a diverse lot. There were rich poor and in between. There were great planters, tradesmen and indentured servants. They came from the West Indies and from England. What they had in common was the opportunity to shape a fertile land that seemed vast and open to people accustomed to the confined space of the West Indian islands and the crowded cities of England. The Lords Proprietors were generous in their grants of land, from the great estates given to the Planters to the relatively large plots given to the indentured servants who survived their years of labor. Some of these former servants were able to rise to the top ranks of society and this mobility was something that could not be equaled in either England or the West Indies.
The independence and prosperous settlements around the Albemarle Sound, which had been founded by Virginians didn’t like the idea that they were included in the royal grant to the Lord Proprietors and thus a part of Carolina ruled from Charles Town. This discontent finally led to the split between North and South Carolina in 1712.
From its founding the Lord Proprietors ruled Carolina as a personal possession. Yes, they were generous in their grants of land, however since this land really belonged to the Indians and had been granted to the Lord Proprietors by a King who had never seen them, they proved the rule that it is easy to be generous with the belongings of others. This generosity did not however, extend to actual control of the colony.
The Coup:
In 1719 the Assembly of South Carolina exhibited independence which would mark its character ever since. Feeling that the Lords Proprietors far off in London were hopelessly unconnected to the affairs of the colony the Assembly revolted and declared themselves to be the governing authority of the colony authorized by the people to take control of governmental affairs. Recognizing the reality of the situation, in 1729 the crown purchased all the rights of the Lords Proprietors and converted the Carolinas into royal colonies. The crown only exercised minimal control, appointing governors and regulating international trade. This exchange of the Colonial Assembly for the Lords Proprietors consolidated the power of the Great Planters. It was they who usually filled the Assembly and it was their children and clients who also filled the courts and the bureaucracies. Often it seemed as if the major object of the colonial government was adjudicating the growth of plantations and the maintenance of Carolina’s ridged slave laws.
Carolina’s Unique Indian Policy
While in most colonies it was one of the principal points of policy to prevent weapons, especially firearms and ammunition from falling into the hands of Indians the leaders in Carolina came up with a novel approach. As mentioned earlier one major concern for the planters was the fear that their large slave population would combine with the indigenous people and overwhelm the greatly outnumbered Caucasians. To forestall this, they came up with the policy that would live in infamy as the Gun Trade.
Here’s how it worked. Instead of working rigorously to keep firearms out of the hands of the Indians the colonists chose powerful local tribes and armed them. Initially this was to be used for enlarging the natives’ ability to obtain furs and skins for trade. Then as time and relationships progressed the colonists engaged the Indians to catch runaway slaves paying for the slaves with more guns. Exploiting the Indians tradition of taking members of other tribes as captives the colonists were also willing to purchase Indian captives which they would send to the West Indies to sell as slaves, thereby making money while at the same time reducing the number of Indians they had to contend with.
This policy caused the tribe being armed to vault to the top of the local power pyramid. Immediately they would begin expanding their territory and raiding as far afield as they could to obtain furs, skins, runaway slaves and captives. These sparked innumerable wars among the tribes further destabilizing them and making them less able to stand up to the constantly expanding colony.
Eventually the first armed tribes started to need more weapons, powder and shot than they could pay for, so they went into debt. When the debt became substantial enough the colonists would arm another tribe and become their allies against the first tribe while at the same time cutting off weapons, repairs and supplies to the first tribe. Soon tribe number two was bringing tribe number one as captives and now they were on the boat to the West Indies. In time the process was repeated with tribe number three against number two and four against three until the Indian problem was solved.
This ingenious way of subverting an entire race spread the influence of the Carolina colony through the Piedmont and into the Blue Ridge Mountains, through the southern plain all the way to the Mississippi as tribes using their technical advantage to attack tribes further out seizing furs, skins, hunting lands and captives. The slaves were intimidated by the ferocious army of armed men waiting for the opportunity to catch and return them if they managed to escape.
The French used an intimate cultural knowledge and the willingness to share the lifestyle of the Native Americans to gain allies and friends. The Spanish sought to turn the Native Americans into Hispanics seeking to convert them into taxpaying subjects. The English of the Chesapeake colonies or New England sought to overwhelm and conquer the natives clearing the land through attrition. Only the colonists of Carolina hit upon the idea of using their economic advantage to pay the Native Americans to destroy themselves.
Economics:
Mercantilism was theory that was dominant in Europe during the 17th and 18th centuries. It held that the wealth of a nation depended on its possession of precious metals. In practice this meant that the governments of Europe sought to maximize foreign trade surpluses by promoting national commercial interests, building a powerful navy and a large merchant marine. These were then used to establish colonies which were seen as sources of raw materials and markets for manufactured products.
As with any colony in an empire based upon the economic theory of Mercantilism, Carolina had to find a way to not only provide a place for people to live but also a way to produce exports to add to the wealth of the homeland. Adapting quickly to the land and its resources the [people of the Carolinas initially became a primary source for the lumber and tar so necessary to ship building and of vital importance to an empire built and sustained by a large and growing navy and merchant marine.
Next, they excelled in the production of cattle and pigs using the warm marshes and nut rich forests to free range their livestock even though it caused irreparable harm to the open fields of the Indians extensive horticulture-based society. However, though these early successes proved the worth of the colony and provided much needed capital for expansion they still needed a cash crop. Virginia had tobacco. New England had fish. Carolina found theirs when they tried growing rice in the humid and rich lowlands of the coastal region. Soon the planters were draining swamps and moving forward to become the rice bowl of the English Empire.
This lucrative enterprise soon afforded the Great Planters a lavish lifestyle rivaling their forefathers in the West Indies and surpassing even what many English Lords were able to sustain. Their homes, their clothes, furniture and jewels were becoming the stuff of legend. Conversely the great rice plantations were built on the homelands of Indian tribes seizing their towns, hunting lands and sacred places. The growth of the rice plantations also caused untold suffering for the tens of thousands of slaves who toiled and died in the disease infested swamps that had been turned into rice paddies. Caucasians were soon the minority in the colony as the slave population swelled. The Great Planters through the Assembly they controlled enacted increasingly stringent slave codes to keep their victims enthralled. While the planters boasted of the liberty they had obtained through their successful coup and their resulting rule by Assembly they kept the majority of the population in abject poverty, ignorance and terror.
Georgia:
No story of the Carolinas can be complete without also sharing the founding of Georgia.
To secure England’s hold on the increasingly prosperous Carolinas, it was decided to establish a colony between the thriving new colony and the Spanish holdings in Florida. Spain was still a formidable power, and she still claimed the land to the north of her Florida holdings. In the past Spanish raiding parties had ranged up and down the Atlantic coast looking for the interlopers.
The effort to establish a buffer colony was led by several wealthy philanthropists headed by James Oglethorpe and collectively known as the Georgia Trustees. It was their intent to accomplish what the Virginia Company had originally said was one of their main goals; provide a place for the rehabilitation and succor of England’s urban poor. Receiving a charter for twenty-one years the trustees had almost total control until the colony would automatically revert to the crown and become a royal colony. The Trustees invested their own money, raised charitable donations and received grants from the crown and the parliament to finance their experiment. James Oglethorpe led the first colonists personally; however, he had no plans to remain in America and after establishing the first few outposts returned to London.
Seeking to maximize the number of small Yeoman farmers and minimize the number of large plantations, the Trustees at first limited people to fifty-acre tracts. They also hoped this would limit the number of slaves since it would not be economically viable to maintain slaves with only fifty acres. They also made the importation or owning of slaves illegal. Another of their innovations was to restrict the growth of rice which required a plantation system and instead encourage the growth of hemp for rope, mulberries for silkworms and silk production, grapes and other crops that didn’t require vast holdings but did require diligent farmers. The goal was to inspire tightly knit densely populated settlements which would provide the large militias needed to protect a long and exposed frontier surrounded by antagonistic tribes and a hostile Spain.
Conclusion:
As the only English colony to outlaw slavery Georgia was at the forefront of liberation and freedom in America but the experiment was not to last. Soon planters from Carolina were migrating and establishing outposts in the territory. Soon to the English colonists wanted to emulate the genteel society and thriving economy of Carolina. The Trustees tried to keep the lid on things by restricting the consumption of rum, and the avocation of lawyers among other things. However, the great distance and the lack of understanding of the colonial experience on the part of the trustees opened a wedge between them and their wards that grew greater and greater as time went on.
Eventually the divide escalated into open rebellion as the colonists sought liberty and property rights including the right to own larger holdings and slaves. Even before the twenty-one years expired the Trustees capitulated to the rising demands and surrendered their rights and so Georgia reverted to the crown becoming a virtual clone of the Carolinas.
America: Colonial History – Introduction December 11, 2024
Posted by Dr. Robert Owens in Uncategorized.Tags: american-history, britain, History, native-americans, Politics
add a comment
History has a reputation of being “BORING!” Back in the Dream Times before the dawn of the Internet, YouTube, and Facebook Early American History was almost exclusively the History of English-speaking man. The geographic area was restricted to the Atlantic coast of North America, and that was about it. Sure, everyone assumed there were women around someplace, but they were merely supporting actors (or actresses as they were once quaintly called). Other European colonists, the Norse, the Spanish, the French, the Dutch, the Swedish, and the Russians were treated as minor actors waiting in the wings to be discarded as soon as it was convenient to get back to the main story about the British. The Native Americans were impediments constantly moved and moved and moved again. And of course, there were African slaves but they were unfortunate victims behind the scenes of what was essentially a walk in the sunshine as the American colonies quickly rose from outposts in the wilderness to gleaming cities on a hill.
Some have called this the Imperial History. Some have called it the Accepted History. Some say it gave birth to a belief in American Exceptionalism. It had certain aspects that were almost interchangeable from author to author. The American colonists were working to improve the wilderness, to establish freedom and develop limited government, free enterprise, and religious toleration. From the earliest beginnings to the culmination of the continental American empire it was one long story of progress and victory. We never started a war, and we never lost one. It wasn’t America right or wrong. It was America never wrong.
From our politically correct, highly sensitized vantage point here in the 21st Century it is easy to say the prior presentations of American History were simplistic, or racist, or filled with gender bias, ethnic bias, and Eurocentric. However, this critique could in itself be accused of being an exercise in Presentism, or the judgment of previous times through the distorting lens of the present. Instead, we need to realize that every society must present a coherent story of why their independent and continued existence is justified and why it is important. Every society must teach their youth that there is a valid reason why their society must continue, or it will soon break apart into its component parts. Multicultural societies will break apart along cultural lines, and multi-racial societies will fracture along racial lines, whatever the social tectonic plates are unless the members of that society are taught to believe in its relevance it will become irrelevant and soon cease to matter.
However, when all the actors and all their stories are added in while the History may not be as consistently uplifting or as universally consistent it is much more interesting, and it is much closer to the facts. Keeping our eyes upon the past let us begin our study seeking to present an honest, interesting, readable and brief representation of our History we will seek guideposts that will help us navigate the future.
In this study we will work to include all the voices while at the same time expressing the uniqueness of America, its history, and its destiny.
First of all, we must accept that the wilderness that has long been the stage for our understanding of European colonization in the Americas was not wilderness to the Native Americans. It was home. Many of these cultures had lived in the same areas for thousands of years. Others were newer arrivals. Whichever they were they had established nations and territories that were unmistakably developed and sovereign. They had established towns and cities, many of which were permanent and extensive. They’d developed some of the most important food crops in the world today. They had extensive trade networks, worship centers, and all the other components of an advanced culture made up of varied societies.
Secondly, the narrative cannot exclude the less savory side if it is to be in any way complete. Therefore, in out text we will encounter the development of racially tinged philosophy, white solidarity, and the oppression and exploitation of others that became an abiding feature of English colonization. We will also watch the transplanted national rivalries that plagued European civilization wherever they planted their flags anywhere in the world. The text will also take notice of the fact that fifty percent of the population was excluded from political and social equality through the gender bias inherited from the past and transplanted to the new world.
In addition, the text attempts to portray a feature of American History which is often neglected or ignored: the proposition that in the colonial period there really wasn’t an “America.” The boundaries which we see as firm and fixed were then nonexistent. Each colony was a separate entity and unless they were surrounded by other colonies such as Delaware or Rhode Island they all thought of themselves as having a growing frontier in the West. They all dealt with sovereign Indian nations as well as with the colonies of other nations. The Atlantic Sea lanes were an open door to the commerce and navies of the world binding America and Americans in the triangle trade between Europe, Africa, and the Americas a trade which bound together the growing community of Western Civilization.
The unimaginably immense impact of the colonials upon the environment of North America is not ignored. The cross-pollination of disease, technology, flora, and fauna, and the political variations of European power strategies outline the Columbian Exchange which has had a massive influence on the subsequent development of the world. Not that pre-Columbian America was static. There had always been the same shifting patterns of life among the tribes and nations of America before the Europeans arrived, but they had always been indigenous except for the fleeting foray of the Norse. After the arrival of the later Europeans in the fifteenth century the Americas would forever be subsumed into the shifting alliances and other variables of European politics.
The larger populations of the colonists, aided by the technological, organizational, and economical developments of the Europeans, possessed the power to gain an overbearing influence in the development of North America once they had established themselves along the East coast. Once the bridgehead was secure the Europeans began an almost continuous advance to the West. Using trade, alliance, and war the sphere of European power grew and grew always bringing environmental, social, and political change as they displaced the native cultures. One thing that is important to remember is that the size and scope of the European movement to North America was not merely a wave or two of immigration. It was so large and so sustained it can only be understood as migration not immigration.
This work is written for non-Historians and is a handy easy to read condensed look at Early American History. It is composed of short chapters, each of which is designed to be a stand-alone treatment of a segment of time. It is my hope that this book will help fill the void that is exposed by the general lack of historical perspective which I believe is a major contributor to America’s current lack of self-awareness of and appreciation for the uniqueness which is the United States.