jump to navigation

Is the Federal Reserve Constitutional? September 30, 2011

Posted by Dr. Robert Owens in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , ,

The Federal Reserve is the central bank of the United States.  It is in charge of printing money issuing bonds and setting interest rates for those bonds.  Article 1, Section 8 says, “The Congress shall have Power … to coin Money, regulate the Value thereof” the Federal Reserve is never mentioned.  Has it always been this way?  Does any other country do this?  How did the Federal Reserve get its power over our currency and our economy?   And the issue so many are interested in today: is the Federal Reserve constitutional?

Has it always been this way?

At the dawn of the Republic our first Secretary of the Treasury Alexander Hamilton issued several reports which in many ways set the tone and pointed the way for the development of America in the economic sphere.  His first report on the public credit recommended that the new central government not only honor the debts contracted under the original government as established under the Articles of Confederation but that it also assume the war debts of the States.  This recommendation was followed by Congress and the Washington administration created what has evolved into a permanent national debt.

In 1790 Hamilton submitted his second report which asked Congress to charter the Bank of the United States.  Several aspects of the bank Hamilton proposed will sound familiar and it can be seen that they provided the mold for the Federal Reserve.  His plan was closely modeled after that used by Great Britain’s Bank of England.  According to Hamilton’s vision the Bank of the United States would be a public/private hybrid.  It would have an exclusive charter for twenty years.  Its initial capitalization would be ten million dollars consisting of eight million from private investors and two million from the government.  Congress would give the Bank the right to print paper money up to the ten million held in deposit.  Most importantly the central government would declare that the notes issued by the Bank would be the only notes which would be accepted in payment for taxes.  This would give the notes of the Bank of the United States credibility and value, which none of its state chartered competitors could match.  This was Hamilton’s proposal.  Now all he had to do was get it passed into law.

The report was introduced into Congress in 1790 and by February 1791 it passed both the House and the Senate and arrived on the desk of President Washington.  This is when the battle of the Titans really began.  Leading Anti-Federalists and strict constructionists such as James Madison, Thomas Jefferson, and Edmund Randolph, argued that the Constitution did not grant the government the power to incorporate a Bank.  It was not an enumerated power and therefore it was reserved to the States or the people.  Those arguing for a strict interpretation of the newly minted Constitution, which Madison and Randolph had helped write, urged Washington in a written report not to sign the bill.


Ever the fulcrum between his philosophically divided advisors Washington presented Hamilton with the argument opposing his plan and asked him to present his argument in favor.  Hamilton using his excellent reasoning and communication skills presented President Washington with the original argument for the implied powers granted to the central government by the Constitution.  This report appealed to what is now known as the “Necessary and Proper” clause.  He argued that the government was inherently empowered to do whatever was necessary to implement the laws required to use the enumerated powers.  President Washington accepted Hamilton’s argument and signed the bill and the first Bank of the United States was born.

Beginning on July 4, 1791the first thing the new Bank did was inflate a financial bubble by offering the largest initial stock offering the nation had ever seen.  Investors showed their confidence in Hamilton’s plan by quickly buying the options on the first issue of stock.  Many of these initial investors were members of Congress.  The initial price for the options was $25.  This was soon bid up to over $300.  It soon crashed to $150.  Thus within days of its first action this original central bank inflated a bubble that soon burst.  However, Secretary Hamilton setting the example for the central bankers to follow stepped into the breach and averted a general financial panic by purchasing government securities with public funds thus stabilizing the markets and rewarding those who had initially speculated.

The bank opened for business in December of 1791.  All manner of people, landowners, manufacturers, merchants, politicians, and most important of all, the government of the United States lined up to deposit money and to obtain the new Bank script.  Within months the Bank was the single largest economic enterprise in the nation.

Beginning a pattern that would be repeated over and over the bank which had been created to ensure a firm foundation for the American economy inflated another bubble and caused another crash.

First the Bank flooded the market with easy loans and a massive issue of paper dollars.  This move added liquidity pushing the new securities market into a sharp rise.  However, then the Bank reversed course and began calling in many loans.  Investors and speculators were especially affected as they were forced to sell securities to pay the loans.  When the largest of the speculators William Duer was forced to declare bankruptcy the markets collapsed.  This in turn caused the financial markets to freeze up putting a stop to much of the nation’s credit and commerce.  This is known as the Panic of 1792.  The crash didn’t last long because Secretary Hamilton once again stepped in and bought government securities with public funds injecting much needed capital into the economy.

Over its 20 year life the first Bank of the United States functioned as the central bank.  It worked to regulate state banks, closing those that issued too much paper.  It attempted to guide the entire economy through its monetary and interest policies.  It coordinated all its branches up and down the east coast to project a united front in its economic policy by either tightening or loosening credit.

By the time it came for a renewal of the bank’s charter the Federalists were no longer in the seats of power and the newly ascendant Democratic Republicans led by Thomas Jefferson defeated its bid for another twenty years, and the first bank of the United States, America’s experiment with central banking was over.

Does any other country do this?  Yes, many other countries have central banks.  Today it is a hallmark of an advanced economy.

How did the Federal Reserve get its power over our currency and our economy?   There were subsequent attempts to establish central banking in the United Sates.  There was a second Bank of the United States chartered in 1816, but after being blamed for a series of bubbles and crashes its charter was not renewed and it ceased operations in 1836.  In 1863 in the depths of the Civil War Congress passed the National Banking Act which chartered numerous Federal Banks.  This law also taxed paper money issued by State banks but not paper money issued by the Federal banks giving them a decided advantage.

In 1913 the Federal Reserve System was born.  It established what is known as a decentralized central bank in that it has semi-autonomous branches.  It was given the power to control the currency, issue bonds, and set interest rates for those bonds.  It was established as a public/private concern and actually owned by stock holders.  Who are these stock holders?  They are private banks, and ownership of stock is required to participate in the system.  The system was instituted to provide the foundation for a stable banking industry and an elastic currency that could be used to smooth the rough edges of the business cycle.  Whether this latest experiment in American\central banking has fulfilled its mission each citizen should judge for themselves.

Is the Federal Reserve constitutional?  The first Bank of the United States was never challenged in court as to whether or not the government had the power to create a central bank.  But the second Bank was.   The Supreme Court in 1819 ruled in McCulloch v. Maryland that it was in fact constitutional due to the implied powers clause.  Thus looking to precedent, and unless the Supreme Court reverses itself, the Federal Reserve is considered to be authorized within the confines of the broadly interpreted Constitution.

There was an important constitutional issue born with the creation of America’s first central bank. With the birth of the first Bank the acceptance and use of implied powers became the central government’s method to expand its powers beyond those expressly delegated in The Constitution.

The argument of Madison, Jefferson, and Randolph upholding a strict constructionist view would be codified and added to the Constitution in the same year the Bank was charted, and perhaps in response to it, in the 10th Amendment, but this did not end the appeal to implied powers as a means to the government’s ends.  In theory this sounds good.  In practice it has turned our limited government into an out of control leviathan that is crushing the free out of our free market and sucking the liberty out of the American experiment.

As my favorite American philosopher once said, “In theory there is no difference between theory and practice.  In practice there is.”

Dr. Owens teaches History, Political Science, and Religion for Southside Virginia Community College.  He is the author of the History of the Future @ http://drrobertowens.com View the trailer for Dr. Owens’ latest book @ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ypkoS0gGn8 © 2011 Robert R. Owens drrobertowens@hotmail.com  Follow Dr. Robert Owens on Facebook or Twitter @ Drrobertowens.



1. David M Zuniga, P.E. - October 3, 2011

What a superb whirlwind history, Robert. I think the question is not whether a president (or Congress, especially) can create banks; McCullough answered that, as did Andrew Jackson, in spades. The question is whether paper can be made a legal tender, when Article I Sections 8 and 10 are crystal clear in black letter: it cannot, unless those sections are amended via an Article V convention.

As you know, George Bancroft’s classic, “A Plea for the Constitution of the United States, Wounded in the House of Its Guardians”, makes this point in a far-too-deferential tone after the third (1884) of the ‘Legal Tender Cases’ rulings. When Congress issed the counterfeiting concession to the banking cartel using the devious brand, ‘Federal Reserve’, it did so on the basis of ‘well-settled’ law that was indeed a legal nullity, ab initio.

The Legal Tender rulings were arrogations; takings, and frauds nowhere authorized by our Supreme Law. No authorization for paper as a legal tender can be possible when the exact opposite appears in the black-letter law: “no State shall use any thing but Gold and Silver Coin as a tender in payment of debts”, and “Congress shall have the power…to coin money…”.

It is thus a contest of wills; of tactical shrewdness. On the one hand, behind the scenes there are Money Powers who have owned politicians of all nations since time-out-of-mind. On the other hand, there are the American People, with the tactical force-massing power of the modern day *Incunabulum* now working its way into a thousand political blogs, hundreds of astute authors, over half a million homeschooling families, and an estimated 15 milliuon supporters of the ‘Tea Party’ spirit of self-governance.

History is on the side of liberty. I’m quite biased, of course, but I think something like the AmericaAgain! Indictment Engine(TM) will create a tipping point for the Tenth Amendment, back to the black-letter law, despite 125 years of violation by presidents, congresses, and US supreme courts alike.

To put it another way: the horizontal checks-and-balances that the so-called ‘Anti-Federalists’ said would fail, did indeed fail. But the Constitution has NOT failed, yet; the VERTICAL check that We The People have yet to attempt, can overturn even the oldest corruption if we will but have faith in God, and in rule of law.

As always, an excellent monograph, professor.

David M. Zuniga, P.E.
Founder, AmericaAgain! Trust

julio Rodriguez - October 3, 2011

There is a hidden nature to this entire central banking business that seems to evade nearly everyone. My Opinion: In truth the purpose of the FEDERAL RESERVE CENTRAL BANK is to aid certain insider Commercial Banks, Jp Morgan, Chase, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, etc.

The purpose of the FEDERAL RESERVE CENTRAL BANK is to facilitate a monopoly by the insider banks. The money making scheme and the fleecing of the public does not lie in the Central Bank, the central bank merely facilitates the schemes used by the private banks. Within these private commercial banks the decision to expand or contract the nations money supply lie.

The decision to cause booms and burst are decided in private conference rooms. These insider banks, along with certain politicians carry out the necessary laws to implement an agenda which is beneficial to the these insider banks. In a busted economy, a recession, the insider banks buy up other banks consolidating their reserves and ability to affect the market as they wish.

Aside from the base money supply and some bank deposits, most of the money is digital, and created by private banks using the fractional reserve banking scheme. Credit exist independently of deposits, and as more credit is issued the economy expands, the less credit the economy contracts.

So in order for banks to exist as true businesses, 100% reserve banking should be a requirement. The congress needs to introduce just the right amount of currency to keep the economy functioning. Too much money and you have inflation, too little money and you have a recession/depression.

2. Don Mashak - January 5, 2012

1st I agree with Mr. Zuniga, the Federal Reserve is not Constitutional.

Further, we now have debt based currency instead of currency backed by specie. Again, unconstitutional.

And finally, since the Federal Central banks have proved disastrous, time after time, they have not proved to be necessary and proper and therefore unconstitutional.

And Finally, by its very “debt nature” the money being issued by the FED is a violation of the 13th Amendment. By its debt nature, the FED can never be paid off. To pay the interest on the original money issued, more money must be printed. Ergo, the debt to the FED can never be retired.

The 13th Amendment prohibits involuntary servitude. Since the dollar is the only legal tender to pay my bills, and since Every dollar is based in debt to the FED, the net result is a percentage of every dollar I earn results in a portion of my hard labor going to pay the private owners of the FED.

This payment to the FED is involuntary. There is no other legal tender I can use to pay my bills.

Effectively this is involuntary servitude to the private owners of the FED.


Therein, endeth the lesson.

3. http://rioradar.com/groups/discussion-in-these-communicate-rooms/ - March 11, 2013

Have you ever thought about including a little
bit more than just your articles? I mean, what
you say is fundamental and all. However imagine if you added some great graphics or videos to give your
posts more, “pop”! Your content is excellent but with images and
clips, this site could certainly be one of the best in
its niche. Superb blog!

Dr. Robert Owens - March 11, 2013

Yes I have thought of adding more and i have added a few cartoons along the way. thanks for your input.

4. haarausfall bei männern - April 29, 2013

Hey! This post couldn’t be written any better! Reading this post reminds me of my old room mate! He always kept talking about this. I will forward this article to him. Fairly certain he will have a good read. Thanks for sharing!

5. www.chinasingels.com - May 13, 2013

Hi, I log on to your new stuff daily. Your writing
style is witty, keep it up!

6. Sharron - May 14, 2013

I was excited to uncover this website. I need to to thank you for your time just for this fantastic read!
! I definitely appreciated every part of it and I have you book-marked to check out
new things on your blog.

7. chat random - June 15, 2013

What’s up, I check your new stuff like every week. Your writing style is awesome, keep doing what you’re doing!

8. HäMorrhoiden Blut - June 21, 2013

Hi, I do think this is an excellent blog. I stumbledupon it 😉 I’m going to return once again since i have bookmarked it. Money and freedom is the greatest way to change, may you be rich and continue to guide others.

9. How to Have a Strong Economy – MATTERS of WORLDVIEW - March 29, 2018

[…] Reserve. In fact, by Constitution, I believe the existence of the Federal Bank is on the edge and tends toward the coalesence of […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: