jump to navigation

Political Warfare and the Impeachment of President Trump August 4, 2017

Posted by Dr. Robert Owens in Uncategorized.

Unless I have entered a parallel universe I seem to remember voting for President Trump because he was going to stand strong against the Neo-cons and their thirst for perpetual war.

I don’t know about anyone else but I thought this was an America First foreign policy which did not send us off tilting at windmills around the globe.  Specifically I thought this meant we would let the Syrians fight their own civil war, let the Russian inhabitants of Eastern Ukraine live according to our time honored principle of self-determination.  They no longer want to be a part of the communist reconstruction of the Ukraine so let them be free.

However, the Deep State has other ideas.  These career bureaucrats who think they are the permanent government no matter who we elect have aligned with the Neo-cons.  They are driving us over a cliff by imposing sanctions even our allies are against and likely will not adhere to.  They are setting up a situation wherein they hope to strip President Trump’s powers and set up a situation where they can impeach him for firing one of his one employees.

This was the same tactic used to impeach President Andrew Johnson.  Then because of one vote it failed.  Today with McCain and the other maverick turncoats voting with the doppelganger Democrat friends it might succeed.

The Neo-Cons have taken over the National Security Council (NSC) under National Security Advisor H.R. McMaster.  Proof of this is seen in the recent firing on July 21 of Rich Higgins, a former Pentagon official who served in the NSC’s strategic-planning office as a director for strategic planning.

What was Higgins sin?  He wrote a memo that described threats to the administration by globalists, bankers, the deep state, and Islamists.  What proscribed advice or intelligence did this memo contain?

Excerpts from the Higgins memo:

Through the campaign, candidate Trump tapped into a deep vein of concern among many citizens that America is at risk and slipping away. Globalists and Islamists recognize that for their visions to succeed, America, both as an ideal and as a national and political identity, must be destroyed. … Islamists ally with cultural Marxists because, as far back as the 1980s, they properly assessed that the left has a strong chance of reducing Western civilization to its benefit. Having co-opted post-modern narratives as critical points, Islamists will co-opt the movement in its entirety at some future point. (NOTE! Communist takeover of Russian revolution against the Czars, N Vietnamese against the South, Maoists against the democratic forces against the Chinese dynasty.)


As used here, “political warfare’ does not concern activities associated with the American political process but rather exclusively refers to political warfare as understood by the Maoist insurgency model. Political warfare is one of the five components of a Maoist insurgency. Maoist methodologies are described as synchronized violent and non-violent actions. This approach envisions the direct use of non-violent operations arts and tactics as elements of combat power In Maoist insurgencies, the formation of a counter-state is essential to seizing state power. Functioning as a hostile compete state acting within an existing state, it has an alternate infrastructure. Political warfare operates as one of the activities of the “counter-state.” Political warfare uses non-violent methods such as participation that undermines the morale or offers to engage in discussions, as a adjunct to violence. Political warfare methods can be implemented at strategic, operations, or tactical levels of operation.

Political warfare is warfare. Strategic information campaigns designed to delegitimize through disinformation arise out of non-violent lines of effort in political warfare regimes. They run on multiple lines of operation, support the larger non-violent line of effort, are coordinated with violent lines of effort, and execute political warfare agenda promoting cultural Marxist outcomes. They principally operate through narratives. Because the left is aligned with Islamist organizations at local, national and international levels, recognition should be given to the fact that they seamlessly interoperate through coordinated synchronized interactive narratives … These attacks narratives are pervasive, full spectrum and institutionalized at all levels. They operate in social media, television, the 24-hour news cycle in all media and are entrenched at the upper levels of the bureaucracies …

Political Warfare has been described as “propaganda in battledress.”

This memo was discarded and Higgins fired because to sound the alarm is to make yourself a target for the enemies of America First.

Unless and until this political warfare is recognized for what it is their stealth victory through bureaucratic slight-of-hand, media barrage, and prosecutorial witch-hunt we will see the impeachment of President Trump and the end of the America First campaign.

And who voted for that?

Dr. Owens teaches History, Political Science, and Religion.  He is the Historian of the Future @ http://drrobertowens.com © 2017 Contact Dr. Owens drrobertowens@hotmail.com  Follow Dr. Robert Owens on Facebook or Twitter @ Drrobertowens / Edited by Dr. Rosalie Owens




%d bloggers like this: